Virtual Communication War in Protests Against the 2024 Election Law in Indonesia: A Netnographic Study on X Hashtags

Authors

  • Ayub Dwi Anggoro Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
  • Fingky Ayu Puspitasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Keywords:

#Indonesiabaikbaiksaja, #KawalPutusanMK, Netnography, Social Media, Virtual Communication

Abstract

This study analyzes virtual communication related to opinion wars on social media concerning the rejection of the revision of the Local Government Election (Pilkada) Law in 2024 in Indonesia. A qualitative approach using a netnography method is employed to examine the contestation of two hashtags on X social media: #KawalPutusanMK and #Indonesiabaikbaiksaja. The hashtag #KawalPutusanMK is used by the public as a form of protest against the revision of the 2024 Local Government Election (Pilkada) Law, which is perceived as lacking transparency and threatening democracy. In contrast, the hashtag #Indonesiabaikbaiksaja emerged as a counter-hashtag supporting political stability and government policies. The results show that interactions on the #KawalPutusanMK hashtag are significantly higher than those on #Indonesiabaikbaiksaja, which tends to be viewed as a propaganda tool by social media users. Furthermore, the #KawalPutusanMK hashtag successfully mobilized public opinion through a strong narrative that was considered authentic, while the #Indonesiabaikbaiksaja hashtag faced many negative accusations. This research reveals how social media serves as an important arena for shaping public opinion and how perceptions of authenticity influence the effectiveness of a movement.

References

Arifah, F. H., & Candrasari, Y. (2022). Pola Komunikasi Virtual Dalam Komunitas Games Online:(Studi Netnografi Pada Komunitas Facebook Genshin Impact Indonesia Official). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 2(2), 55–66.

Baeva, L. V. (2018). Communication in the E-Culture and Media: New Trends and Features. In The Changing Scope of Technoethics in Contemporary Society (pp. 327–342). IGI Global.

Brady, W. J., & Crockett, M. J. (2019). How effective is online outrage? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2).

Castells, M. (2011). The power of identity. John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.

Damanik, E. L. (2018). Hashtag# 2019GantiPresiden: Sentimen Anti-petahana dan Orientasi Politik Pemilih Pemula menghadapi Pilpres 2019 di Pematangsiantar Hashtag# 2019ChangePresident: Anti-incumbent Sentiment and Political Orientation of the New Voters.

Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved?: participation, deliberation and social movements. John Wiley & Sons.

Diamond, L., & Plattner, M. F. (2012). Liberation technology: Social media and the struggle for democracy. JHU Press.

Eriyanto, E. (2020). Hashtags and Digital Movement of Opinion Mobilization: A Social Network Analysis/SNA Study on# BubarkanKPAI vs# KamiBersamaKPAI Hashtags. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(3), 1.

Kasmani, F. (2022). Persuasive political humour on social media: A study of Najib Razak’s Facebook posts. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 14(1), 1–17.

Khmel, I. (2021). Humanization of Virtual Communication: from Digit to Image. Philosophy and Cosmology, 27(27), 126–134.

Kozinets, R. V, & Handelman, J. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1).

Kurniawan, E. P., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Agenda Setting Dalam Isu-Isu Kontemporer Di Seluruh Dunia. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 3(1), 105–119.

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2018). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. In Advances in foundational mass communication theories (pp. 131–152). Routledge.

Nugraha, M. Y. S., Ayuningtyas, F., & Muqsith, M. A. (2024). Connective Action dan Hashtag activism di Twitter/X Case Studi: Pemilihan Presiden 2024 Pendekatan Social Network Analyst. PERSPEKTIF, 13(3), 717–726.

Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6(2), 181–201.

Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838.

Puspitasari, F. A., & Anggoro, A. D. (2024). Analysis of Public Opinion on The Hashtag# AniesPresidenRI2024 on Social Media Twitter. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 8(1), 103–122.

Rauschnabel, P. A., Sheldon, P., & Herzfeldt, E. (2019). What motivates users to hashtag on social media? Psychology & Marketing, 36(5), 473–488.

Sahrasad, H., Nurdin, M. A., Chaidar, A., Mulky, M. A., & Zulkarnaen, I. (2020). Virtual jihadism: Netnographic analysis on trends of terrorism threats. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 12(3), 71–85.

Singer, P. W., & Brooking, E. T. (2018). LikeWar: The weaponization of social media. Eamon Dolan Books.

Soares, F. B., & Recuero, R. (2021). Hashtag wars: Political disinformation and discursive struggles on Twitter conversations during the 2018 Brazilian presidential campaign. Social Media+ Society, 7(2), 20563051211009070.

Watson, E. (2020). # Education: The potential impact of social media and hashtag ideology on the classroom. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 40–56.

Wyatt, M. S. (n.d.). THE WEAPONIZATION OF INFORMATION AND ITS USE THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30