Reception of Audiences Aged 8–15 Years to Gimmick and Sarcasm in Windah Basudara's YouTube Content

Authors

  • Gibran M. Gibran Pratama Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Fitrinanda An Nur Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Keywords:

Audience reception, Windah Basudara, digital observation, content analysis, youth media, sarcasm, gimmick, Brainrot, media literacy, encoding/decoding

Abstract

This study explores the audience reception of children and early teenagers (ages 8–15) toward YouTube content by Windah Basudara, known for his sarcastic style and repeated use of gimmicks. Using digital observation and content analysis methods, this research investigates how young viewers interpret media messages and how viral trends like “Brainrot” influence their media consumption behavior. Based on Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding theory, findings indicate that young audiences tend to accept meanings hegemonically without critical reflection. These results highlight the urgent need for digital media literacy education at an early age.  

References

APJII. (2023). Laporan Survei Penetrasi dan Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2023.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

Common Sense Media. (2023). The Commonsense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens in Southeast Asia. Common Sense Media Research Report.

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (2015). "Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony." Discourse Processes, 19(3), 347-367.

Gerbner, G. (1998). "Cultivation Analysis: An Overview." Mass Communication and Society, 1(3-4), 175-194.

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Council of Europe Colloquy on "Training in the Critical Reading of Televisual Language". University of Leicester.

Jenkins, H. (2016). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (Edisi revisi). New York University Press.

Kominfo. (2024). Statistik Digital Indonesia 2024. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.

Potter, W. J. (2019). Media Literacy (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.

SocialBlade. (2024). YouTube Channel Analytics Report: Windah Basudara. SocialBlade Data Analytics.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Left Coast Press.

Rieder, B. (2015). YouTube Data Tools: An infrastructure for collecting and analyzing YouTube video metadata. First Monday, 20(2).

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.

Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (2nd ed.).

Polity Press.

Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Council of Europe Colloquy on "Training in the Critical Reading of Televisual Language". University of Leicester.

Jenkins, H. (2016). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (Edisi revisi).

New York University Press.

LaMarre, H. L., Landreville, K. D., & Beam, M. A. (2014). "The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report." The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 212-231.

Livingstone, S. (2019). Parenting for a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears about Technology Shape Children's Lives. Oxford University Press.

Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears about Technology Shape Children's Lives. Oxford University Press.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2017). Plugged In: How Media Attract and Affect Youth. Yale University Press.

Zajc, M. (2015). "Social Media, Prosumption, and Dispositives: New Mechanisms of the Construction of Subjectivity." Journal of Consumer Culture, 15(1), 28-47. Retry HI

Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2020). Teens, Social Media and Technology. Pew Research Center. Buckingham, D. (2019). The Media Education Manifesto. Polity Press.

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (2015). "Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony."

Discourse Processes, 19(3), 347-367.

Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2018). "The Past, Present, and Future of Media Literacy Education."

Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1), 1-11.

McGhee, P. E., & Lloyd, S. A. (1982). "Developmental Changes in Children's Comprehension of Humor: Incongruity and Resolution." Child Development, 53(2), 512-519.

Phillips, W., & Milner, R. M. (2017). The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Polity Press.

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press.

Uhls, Y. T., & Robb, M. B. (2017). "How Parents Mediate Children's Media Consumption." In

F. C. Blumberg & P. J. Brooks (Eds.), Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts (pp. 325-343). Academic Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30