Can Trust Be Restored? Institutional Communication in Addressing Sexual Violence in Indonesian Higher Education
Keywords:
institutional communication, sexual violence, public trust, higher education governance, IndonesiaAbstract
Sexual violence in higher education has emerged as a critical issue that threatens the safety of academic communities and undermines public trust in educational institutions. In Indonesia, increasing reports of sexual violence on campuses have prompted regulatory responses and the establishment of institutional mechanisms for prevention and handling. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms largely depends on how institutions manage communication in preventing, responding to, and addressing such cases. This study examines how institutional communication operates in addressing sexual violence within Indonesian higher education institutions and how it relates to the restoration of public trust. Using a qualitative multiple case study approach, this research investigates three Indonesian public universities that have implemented institutional frameworks for the prevention and handling of sexual violence. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with institutional actors, including members of prevention task forces, faculty, administrators, and students, as well as through document analysis. The findings reveal that institutional communication plays a pivotal role in shaping transparency, accountability, and responsiveness in handling sexual violence cases. Effective communication practices not only facilitate coordination among institutional actors but also contribute to rebuilding trust among campus communities and the broader public. The study highlights that communication governance within institutions is essential in addressing sexual violence as both a crisis and a structural issue. By demonstrating how communication practices influence institutional credibility, this research contributes to broader discussions on public trust, institutional accountability, and social impact in higher education governance.
References
Boivin, G., Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Barker, J. R. (2017). The institutionalization of CCO scholarship: Trends from 2000 to 2015. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916687396
Bondestam, F., & Lundqvist, M. (2020). Sexual harassment in higher education: A systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1729833
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed., pp. 173–194). SAGE.
Butler, S. D. (2021). Impacted publics’ perceptions of crisis communication decision making. Public Relations Review, 47(5), Article 102120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102120
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eriyanto. (2014). Analisis jaringan komunikasi: Strategi baru dalam penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2013). Public relations and the new institutionalism: In search of a theoretical framework. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X13485353
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2017). Organizational crisis communication. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235208
Ghosh, S., Su, M.-H., Abhishek, A., Suk, J., Tong, C., Kamath, K., Hills, O., Correa, T., Garlough, C., Borah, P., & Shah, D. (2022). Covering #MeToo across the news spectrum: Political accusation and public events as drivers of press attention. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220968081
Huang, M., & Ki, E.-J. (2023). Protecting organizational reputation during a para-crisis: The effectiveness of conversational human voice on social media and the roles of construal level, social presence, and organizational listening. Public Relations Review, 49(5), Article 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102389
Johansen, B. F., Johansen, W., & Weckesser, N. M. (2016). Emotional stakeholders as “crisis communicators” in social media: The case of the Telenor customer complaints crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2015-0026
Luoma-aho, V., & Vos, M. (2010). Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: Acknowledging multiple issue arenas. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011068159
Marshall, M. N. (1996). The key informant technique. Family Practice, 13(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.1.92
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
Pahwa, M., Cavanagh, A., & Vanstone, M. (2023). Key informants in applied qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 33(14), 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231198796
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
van Riel, C. B. M., & Fombrun, C. J. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jogjakarta Communication Conference (JCC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
