Decolonizing Digital Conflict: Epistemic Friction in Indonesian Digital Communication

Authors

Keywords:

decolonizing communication, digital conflict, epistemic friction, harmony oriented communication, Indonesian digital communication, Southeast Asian digital communication

Abstract

Digital communication platforms have transformed how individuals interact, participate in public discourse, and negotiate social meaning. While these platforms enable unprecedented connectivity, they have also intensified the emergence of digital conflict, manifested in polarization, public shaming, and rapid escalation of interpersonal disputes across networked publics. Existing explanations of digital conflict often emphasize technological affordances, algorithmic amplification, or psychological dynamics of online interaction. Although these perspectives provide important insights, they often overlook the cultural and epistemological foundations that shape communication practices across societies. This paper argues that understanding digital conflicts must take into account the interaction between digital infrastructure and the epistemology of communication rooted in culture. Drawing on the Indonesian context, the study introduces the concept of epistemic friction to explain tensions that arise when relational communication traditions encounter digital platforms structured around visibility, immediacy, and engagement. Indonesian communication practices have long been shaped by cultural orientations emphasizing harmony, contextual sensitivity, and the preservation of social relationships. When such harmony-oriented communication operates in digital environments that reward expressive visibility and emotional engagement, misalignments may emerge, contributing to the escalation of digital conflict. By conceptualizing digital conflict through the lens of epistemic friction, this paper contributes to ongoing efforts to decolonize communication theory. Rather than treating Western models of communicative confrontation as universal, the framework proposed here foregrounds indigenous communication epistemologies as valuable sources of theoretical insight. The study therefore offers a culturally grounded perspective for understanding digital communication dynamics in Indonesia and other societies where relational communication traditions intersect with globally standardized digital platforms.

Author Biographies

Prahastiwi Utari, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Communication Department

Pramana, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Communication Department

References

APJII. (2023). Survei penetrasi internet Indonesia 2023. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.

Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Routledge.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity.

Curran, J., & Park, M. J. (Eds.). (2000). De-Westernizing media studies. Routledge.

DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Press.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.

Kim, M. S. (2002). Non-Western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Sage.

Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. Sage.

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

Miike, Y. (2007). An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701390093

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Tapsell, R. (2017). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. Rowman & Littlefield.

Thussu, D. K. (Ed.). (2009). Internationalizing media studies. Routledge.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Sage.

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Wang, G. (Ed.). (2011). De-Westernizing communication research: Altering questions and changing frameworks. Routledge.

Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376178

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30