Does Digital Inclusion Guarantee Digital Safety? Gendered Cyber Vulnerabilities among Urban Women Farmer Groups
Keywords:
Digital inclusion, Digital safety, Gender, Delegated control, Urban women farmer groupsAbstract
The expansion of the platform-based economy in the digital era has driven increased digital inclusion for women’s groups, including urban women farmer communities. However, increased digital access and participation are not always accompanied by strengthened digital security. This study aims to analyze how urban women farmer groups construct and negotiate digital security literacy within platform economy practices, and to identify the gap between digital inclusion and account security sovereignty. This study fills a theoretical gap in the digital inclusion and digital literacy literature, which tends to emphasize individual access and skills without considering the distribution of security control based on social and gender relations. The study used a qualitative case study approach with one women’s farmer group in Malang City, Indonesia, involving eight informants (six members and two marketplace administrators). Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and observations of digital communication practices. The results indicate that although the group’s digital engagement is high, centralized marketplace account management and password-sharing practices within the domestic sphere create a sense of delegated control. Digital security is understood as a matter of interpersonal trust, rather than systematic procedures, thus giving rise to relational vulnerabilities. The conclusion is that digital inclusion does not automatically guarantee digital security; Security sovereignty depends on the distribution of control within domestic and collective structures, so security literacy needs to be understood as a relational social practice.
References
Abell, A., & Biswas, D. (2023). Digital Engagement on Social Media: How Food Image Content Influences Social Media and Influencer Marketing Outcomes. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221128556
Bagchi-Sen, S., Rao, H. R., &, Upadhyaya, S. J., & Chai, S. (2010). Women in cybersecurity: A study of career advancement. IT Professional, 12(1), 24–31.
Carcelén-García, S., Narros-González, M. J., & Galmes-Cerezo, M. (2023). Digital vulnerability in young people: gender, age and online participation patterns. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), 2287115.
Cheng, Y. W., & Bilal, A. (2025). Regulatory data privacy concerns in proliferating IoT era of telecommunication data monetisation: a systematic literature review. Computing, 107(9), 190.
Dziewa, A., & Glowacz, F. (2022). Getting out from intimate partner violence: Dynamics and processes. A qualitative analysis of female and male victims’ narratives. Journal of Family Violence, 37(4), 643–656.
Fahmi, M. H., Widayati, S., & Setiyaningsih, L. A. (2021). Phenomenology Study of Rural Women Identity, Information Communication Technology and Human Security. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICONISS) 2020, 1–8.
Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
Helsper, E. J., & Smahel, D. (2020). Excessive internet use by young Europeans: psychological vulnerability and digital literacy? Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1255–1273.
Kateryna, A., Oleksandr, R., Mariia, T., Iryna, S., Evgen, K., & Anastasiia, L. (2020). Digital Literacy Development Trends in the Professional Environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(7), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.4
Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2020). Examining gender differences in people’s information-sharing decisions on social networking sites. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.004
Mey, G. (2022). Qualitative methodology. In International handbook of psychology learning and teaching (pp. 453–478). Springer.
Nath, T. D., & Athinuwat, D. (2021). Key factors of women empowerment in organic farming. GeoJournal, 86(6), 2501–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10211-6
Njie, B., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Case study as a choice in qualitative methodology. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(3), 35–40.
Olivier, D. W., & Heinecken, L. (2017). Beyond food security: women’s experiences of urban agriculture in Cape Town. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(3), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9773-0
Palupi, Palupi. (2019). Selective Self-Presentation Through Video-Mediated Communication:A Study of Hyperpersonal Communication. MediaTor, 12(1), 102-112.
Saadi, Z. M., Sadiq, A. T., Akif, O. Z., & Farhan, A. K. (2024). A survey: security vulnerabilities and protective strategies for graphical passwords. Electronics, 13(15), 3042.
Setiyaningsih, L. A., & Jatmikowati, S. H. (2019). Media Baru Dalam Komodifikasi Waktu Luang Ibu Rumah Tangga. ETTISAL: Journal of Communication, 4(1), 23–32.
Setiyaningsih, L. A., & Fahmi, M. H. (2025). Mengkaji Ulang Literasi Digital dan Adopsi Media Digital oleh Kelompok Wanita Tani Perkotaan di Negara ASEAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS), 4, 1165–1184.
Setiyaningsih, L. A., Fahmi, M. H., & Molyo, P. D. (2021). Selective Exposure Media Sosial Pada Ibu dan Perilaku Anti Sosial Anak. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33366/jkn.v3i1.65
Shankar, V., Grewal, D., Sunder, S., Fossen, B., Peters, K., & Agarwal, A. (2022). Digital marketing communication in global marketplaces: A review of extant research, future directions, and potential approaches. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.005
Siahaan, A. L. S. (2022). Urgensi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Platform Marketplace Terhadap Kemajuan Teknologi. . Majalah Hukum Nasional, 52(2), 209–223.
Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. Int’l Lab. Rev., 133, 531.
Smit, A., Swart, J., & Broersma, M. (2025). Bypassing digital literacy: Marginalized citizens’ tactics for participation and inclusion in digital societies. New Media & Society, 27(6), 3127–3145. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231220383
Teixeira, T. C. (2023). Gendering Cyberwarfare: Towards a Feminist Approach to the Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. . CEBRI-Revista: Brazilian Journal of International Affairs, 7, 58–80.
Tickner, J. A. (2004). Feminist responses to international security studies. Peace Review, 16(1), 43–48.
Upadhyay, P., Kumar, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Adlakha, A. (2022). Continual usage intention of platform-based governance services: A study from an emerging economy. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101651
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235.
Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41–49.
Yurembam, G. S., Pramanik, M., Yengkhom, R. D., Hemochandra, L., Chakma, B., Jhajharia, D., & Patle, G. T. (2025). Integration of Digital Innovation in Urban Farming: A Review towards Advancing Sustainable Food Security in South and Southeast Asian Cities. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 62(2), 494–517. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025622.1937
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jogjakarta Communication Conference (JCC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



