Communication Patterns of Minang Students in Yogyakarta in Maintaining Good Relationships with Parents

Authors

  • David Dwi Pangga Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Suciati Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Family Communication, Migrant Students, Minangkabau, Digital Communication, Communication Patterns

Abstract

Digital communication within migrant student families plays a crucial role in maintaining the continuity of relationships between children and their parents. This study aims to describe the communication patterns of Minangkabau students who migrate to Yogyakarta in sustaining their relationships with their parents. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews. A purposive sampling technique was used to select informants aligned with the research objectives: Minangkabau students who had migrated for at least 6 months and regularly communicated with their parents via digital media. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation and prolonged engagement. The findings indicate that the coordinative pattern emerged as the most dominant pattern across the three informant pairs. This pattern is characterized by communication triggered by financial and academic administrative needs, accompanied by rational explanations, clarification, negotiation, and parental validation before decisions are made. Educational demands shape the coordinative pattern, students’ financial dependence, Minangkabau cultural values embedded in the tradition of merantau, an interdependent family relational structure, and the support of digital communication technologies. These findings demonstrate that family communication in the context of educational migration not only maintains emotional closeness but also serves as a mechanism for shared decision making.

References

Afifi, W. A., & Olson, L. N. (2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 192–216.

Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2020). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and family relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(2), 262–280.

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. The Guilford Press.

BPS DIY 2023. (n.d.). Jumlah Perguruan Tinggi, Dosen, dan Mahasiswa di Bawah Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi DI Yogyakarta, 2023.

Bruess, C. J. S. (2015). Family communication: Nurturing and control in a changing world (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.

Galvin, K. M., Braithwaite, D. O., & Bylund, C. L. (2019). Family Communication: Cohesion and Change. Routledge.

Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2023). Technology and family relationships: A decade review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(1), 7–25.

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2017). Patterns Theory: A Social Cognitive Approach. January 2006. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420.n4

Koerner, A., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2006). Family Communication Patterns Theory: A Social Cognitive Approach. In Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 50– 65).

Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Muksin, N. N., Shabana, A., & Tohari, M. A. (2019). Komunikasi Online Pekerja Migran Indonesia (PMI) dalam Pengelolaan Finansial. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan, 20(2), 97–110.

Mulyana, D. (2017). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munir, M., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2021). Merantau tradition and cultural identity of Minangkabau people. Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 101–112.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30