Content Analysis and Social Construction of Power and Resistance in Dressrosa Arc of One Piece Anime: A Foucauldian Perspective
Keywords:
Power Resistance, One Piece, Content Analysis, Social Construction, Foucault, Popular Media; AnimeAbstract
This study examines the construction of power and resistance in the Dressrosa Arc of the One Piece anime through qualitative content analysis and social construction theory. Popular media functions as an arena where social meanings are shaped, given meaning, and widely distributed through narratives, symbols, and visual representations. Using Michel Foucault's power theory framework, this research analyzes how power is represented through discourse, normalization, and knowledge-power relations in the Dressrosa Arc. The research method employs qualitative content analysis on 118 episodes (629-746) with systematic coding procedures based on Foucault's theoretical framework. The findings reveal that power in Dressrosa is constructed through five main categories: power discourse (WK), truth production (PK), normalization of domination (ND), knowledge-power relations (RPK), and resistance practices (PR). Visual symbols and narrative structures play a crucial role in legitimizing authoritarian power through manipulation of information, memory control, and systematic violence. The analysis demonstrates that resistance emerges through solidarity, collective action, and counter-narratives that challenge dominant power structures. This study contributes to communication science by demonstrating how popular media constructs power meanings through audiovisual texts and how audiences interpret power dynamics and resistance symbolically. The findings provide insights into media literacy, critical analysis of popular culture, and understanding of contemporary power relations.
References
Anney, V. N. (2015). Ensuring the Quality of the Findings of Qualitative Research: Looking at Trustworthiness Criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272–281.
Barasa, M., & Riyanto, F. X. A. (2023). Analisis Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault atas Propaganda Media dalam Membangun Diskursus Politik. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 6(1), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1785
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 41, Number 5, pp. 545–547). Oncology Nursing Society. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
De Archellie, R., Holil, M., & Waworuntu, A. (2020). Indonesian local politics and the marriage of elite interests: Case study of elite democracy in Gorontalo. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1838090
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. In African Journal of Emergency Medicine (Vol. 7, Number 3, pp. 93–99). African Federation for Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Fayez Ismail, O. (2021). Constructing a metadata model to capture the deconstruction of literary characters: Remediation of evil. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1973649
Fensi, F. (2025). Language, power, and media intimidation: a Foucauldian discourse analysis. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 9(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v9i2.10040
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject. In Source: Critical Inquiry (Vol. 8, Number 4).
Krippendorff, Klaus. (2004). Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Kutanto, H., Jatisidi, A., & Lestari, R. (2023). Penyajian Podcast Komite Akreditasi Nasional “Podcastkan” Sebagai Media Informasi Skema Akreditasi (Vol. 14, Number 1). www.youtube.com
Oparinde, K., & Matsha, R. M. (2021). Powerful Discourse: Gender-Based Violence and Counter-Discourses in South Africa. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1911035
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Pinontoan, N. A., Pantja Djati, S., & Rahmanita, M. (2024). Model Strategi Komunikasi Pariwisata Dalam Melakukan Branding Pecinan Glodok (Vol. 15, Number 1).
Priyatna, A. A., & Maryani, E. (2023). Spasialisasi dan Strukturasi Industri Suara Melalui Audio on Demand Pada Platform Podcast Noice (Vol. 14, Number 1).
Quemener, N., & Julliard, V. (2023). Défaire le genre des représentations médiatiques et des dispositifs numériques. Communication, vol. 40/2. https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.18028
Retno Hariatiningsih, L., Iman El Hidayah, N., & Anjasmoro Ningtyas, D. (2024). Konstruksi Pesan Penjaja Kuliner Ramadhan Pada Media Sosial Instagram (Vol. 15, Number 1).
Schreier, M. (2012). Margrit Schreier Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. www.sagepub.co.uk/schreier
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. In Education for Information (Vol. 22). IOS Press.
Syam, F. F. (2025). Efek Polarisasi Algortima Media: Analisis Teori Power Dan Knowlegde Michel Foucault. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 3424–3531. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1070
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jogjakarta Communication Conference (JCC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



